What are people using as 'Test a package' script for their node packages ? I have taken several node modules from my test project and searched for scripts.test in their package.json.
Here is complete listing of script.test values from package.json files:
assert-plus
aws-sign2
bindings
byline
cli
combined-stream
core-util-is
cssom
ctype
delayed-stream
difflib
domelementtype
forever-agent
heap
inherits
jshint
json-diff.bin
mime
nan
node-uuid
nwmatcher
tunnel-agent
xml2js
xmlhttprequest
xpath
dreamopt ./node_modules/.bin/mocha
json-diff ./node_modules/mocha/bin/mocha
json-diff-patch echo Error: no test specified && exit 1
wordwrap expresso
when jshint . && buster-test -e node && promises-aplus-tests test/promises-aplus-adapter.js
json make test
printf make test
qs make test
boom make test-cov
cryptiles make test-cov
hawk make test-cov
hoek make test-cov
sntp make test-cov
entities mocha && npm run lint
htmlparser2 mocha && npm run lint
domhandler mocha -R list && jshint index.js test/
domutils mocha test/tests/**.js && jshint index.js test/**/*.js lib/*.js
cli-color node ./node_modules/tad/bin/tad lib
es5-ext node ./node_modules/tad/bin/tad lib
jsdom node ./test/runner
inherits node test
marked node test
json-stringify-safe node test.js
oauth-sign node test.js
sax node test/index.js
combined-stream node test/run.js
form-data node test/run.js
request node tests/run.js
punycode node tests/tests.js
open node_modules/mocha/bin/mocha
contextify nodeunit test/
async nodeunit test/test-async.js
cssstyle nodeunit tests
xmldom proof platform win32 && proof test */*/*.t.js || t/test
JSONStream set -e; for t in test/*.js; do echo '***' '***'; node ; done
through set -e; for t in test/*.js; do node ; done
asn1 tap ./tst
lru-cache tap test
minimatch tap test
glob tap test/*.js
graceful-fs tap test/*.js
isarray tap test/*.js
jsonparse tap test/*.js
sigmund tap test/*.js
readable-stream tap test/simple/*.js
string_decoder tap test/simple/*.js
http-signature tap tst/*.js
tough-cookie vows test.jsNo test specified
25 modules have no test specified. It means they have no test or if they have it, you must read the manual how to run it.
tap (Test Anything Protocol tools for node)
11 modules uses tap.
mocha
7 modules uses mocha as their test runner. Also here are differencies, some people rely on global mocha installed, some use local node module.
dreamopt ./node_modules/.bin/mocha
json-diff ./node_modules/mocha/bin/mocha
entities mocha && npm run lint
htmlparser2 mocha && npm run lint
domhandler mocha -R list && jshint index.js test/
domutils mocha test/tests/**.js && jshint index.js test/**/*.js lib/*.js
open node_modules/mocha/bin/mochamake
8 uses make
vows
1 uses vows - Asynchronous BDD & continuous integration for node.js
Linting as part of test process
5 uses linting as part of their test process, some more can be hidden in make files (TODO:)
when jshint . && buster-test -e node && promises-aplus-tests test/promises-aplus-adapter.js
entities mocha && npm run lint
htmlparser2 mocha && npm run lint
domhandler mocha -R list && jshint index.js test/
domutils mocha test/tests/**.js && jshint index.js test/**/*.js lib/*.jsnpm run lint and scripts.lint
Some projects also use scrpts.lint property in their package.json file.
This is arbitrary script and can be run with npm run lint
scripts:{
....
lint: jshint index.js lib/*.js test/*.js,
....
lint: jshint lib/*.js test/*.js test/*/*.js
....
}Naming your test folder
test vs. tests vs. tst or even using directories: in package.json
test modules and devDependencies
Most of used modules use this correctly anyway, for mocha and tap based project.
Other patterns seen
TODO: finish the texts
directories: {
test: tests
}
// in domutils/package.jsonLessons learned
How npm handles the scripts field
Must read: https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/scripts
Flexible definition of test frameworks
{
devDependencies: {
tap: ,
mocha:
},
scripts: {
test-tap: tap tst/*.js,
test-mocha:mocha -R list .,
test:npm run test-mocha
}
}Combining test from multile steps
{
"devDependencies": {
"tap": "",
"mocha": "",
"nsp": "",
"jshint": ""
},
"scripts": {
"test-tap": "tap tst/*.js",
"test-mocha": "mocha -R list .",
"lint": "jshint test/test.js",
"test-security": "npm shrinkwrap && nsp audit-shrinkwrap",
"test": "npm run test-mocha && npm run lint && npm run test-security"
}
} This features also nsp, nodesecurity project, to check your dependencies for known vulnerabilities as part of test process.
tap vs. mocha vs. vows vs. ...
Currently I use mocha on my projects. Based on my dependency modules analyzed the tap seems more popular however.
In global mocha seems to be most popular an raising. see www.npm-stats.com for charts: vows, tap and mocha
