tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524994683452597169.post708446563068188703..comments2024-02-22T09:00:38.887+00:00Comments on a.in.the.k: A better(????) way to author alternate text The real function of alternate texta.in.the.k (@ainthek)http://www.blogger.com/profile/09679088403085703700noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524994683452597169.post-83445091828812882352010-11-24T19:26:20.426+00:002010-11-24T19:26:20.426+00:00All depends on context: If IMG is primary source o...All depends on context: If IMG is primary source of information = CONTENT, we need degrade to provide alternative for techno. or otherwise "impaired". If text is a primary source and image is just "better" and fancier form, I would choose CSS. Your article has chosen maybe just wrong samples. Or I'm "reading it" in wrong order ;-)a.in.the.k (@ainthek)https://www.blogger.com/profile/09679088403085703700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524994683452597169.post-28087868124606281062010-11-24T18:17:12.315+00:002010-11-24T18:17:12.315+00:00Screen readers ? Big chance something like "...Screen readers ? Big chance something like " by pressing /image of/ screen button ". Not bad but ....but "i /image of love/ you " would really confuse me. I Still prefer enhanced text over degraded image for this usecase.a.in.the.k (@ainthek)https://www.blogger.com/profile/09679088403085703700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524994683452597169.post-52360924670131712162010-11-24T17:34:09.753+00:002010-11-24T17:34:09.753+00:00Progressive enhancement vs degradation ? Image ins...Progressive enhancement vs degradation ? Image instead of text is enhancement. Should be css not content not markup. Your aproach is degradation.:-))) sorry veterana.in.the.k (@ainthek)https://www.blogger.com/profile/09679088403085703700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8524994683452597169.post-4276489853805641302010-11-24T15:58:51.643+00:002010-11-24T15:58:51.643+00:00Thank you Troy McClure.
Perhaps a review of the f...Thank you Troy McClure.<br /><br />Perhaps a review of the following will help you better understand what you don't understand: <br />http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#gl-provide-equivalents<br /><br />Thoughts you may not like... but you need to remember.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com